SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce is blasting the agency’s decision to attack the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, forcing the company to eliminate its staking program and pay a $30 million fine.
In an official letter of dissent, Peirce says the SEC’s repeated attempts to regulate the industry through enforcement are bad for the average American investor.
[adinserter block="1"]“Today, the SEC shut down Kraken’s staking program and counted it as a win for investors. I disagree and therefore dissent…
Instead of taking the path of thinking through staking programs and issuing guidance, we again chose to speak through an enforcement action, purporting to ‘make clear to the marketplace that staking-as-a-service providers must register and provide full, fair, and truthful disclosure and investor protection.’
[1] Using enforcement actions to tell people what the law is in an emerging industry is not an efficient or fair way of regulating. [2] Moreover, staking services are not uniform, so one-off enforcement actions and cookie-cutter analysis does not cut it.”
Accusing companies in the emerging industry of wrongdoing, launching legal action and forcing settlements instead of offering clear guidelines is paternalistic and lazy, says Peirce.
“Most concerning, though, is that our solution to a registration violation is to shut down entirely a program that has served people well. The program will no longer be available in the United States, and Kraken is enjoined from ever offering a staking service in the United States, registered or not. A paternalistic and lazy regulator settles on a solution like the one in this settlement: do not initiate a public process to develop a workable registration process that provides valuable information to investors, just shut it down.”
Although she’s open to increased corporate transparency, Peirce says it’s now clear the SEC is flat-out hostile toward the crypto industry at large.
“More transparency around crypto-staking programs like Kraken’s might well be a good thing. However, whether we need a uniform regulatory solution and if that regulatory solution is best provided by a regulator that is hostile to crypto, in the form of an enforcement action, is less clear.”
You can check out the full letter of dissent here.
Follow us on X, Facebook and TelegramDon't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any assets including cryptocurrencies, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.
Featured Image: Shutterstock/Don Roberts
